Say Goodbye to the Bonus
Accrual basis taxpayers are generally permitted to deduct accrued compensation if it’s paid out within 2 1/2 months after year end. In a recent Chief Counsel Advice, the IRS announced that they would not permit deductions for accrued bonuses if payment is contingent upon continued employment at the date the bonus is actually paid. If you haven’t finalized your year-end bonus plan and expect a deduction, you should ensure that employees are not required to be employed at the payment date. This may be difficult for many companies, as bonus policies are usually established well in advance of the year-end, but there’s still time to change it if you can.
Tax Help for All Businesses Great and Small
In February the normal two year carryback period for Net Operating Losses (NOL’s) was extended to 3, 4 or 5 years for electing small businesses. Earlier this month, the 3, 4 or 5 year NOL carryback election was extended to all business (except taxpayers receiving help from the Federal government under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act). The carryback is valid for any years ending after December 31, 2007 and commencing before January 1, 2010 – you can even make the election if you previously elected to forego the 2 year carryback period.
What’s the catch? Well, you can only make the election once (qualifying small businesses who were previously eligible now get to make the election twice). Also, if you elect the 5 year carryback, you can only offset 50% of that year’s income with the NOL. Other guidelines, including details for how to elect the carryback were issued by the IRS last week.
Extended carryback periods have been used by the IRS before, and should help many businesses who were profitable by expediting the tax benefit from recent losses. We certainly hope it helps more businesses to keep going during tough economic times, and keep more people employed.
IFRS – Time to Panic?
In recent months the focus of discussions related to adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standards have centered on differences with US GAAP (such as LIFO inventory), timing and implementation. I don’t want to debate the necessity of adopting a world standard given our weakening influence over the world economy, or the esoteric benefits or detriments. My concerns are much more basic. Without tort reform in the United States, IFRS is a time bomb with a very short fuse resulting in a cataclysmic disaster waiting to happen.
Currently, US GAAP is a rules based set of standards. While the end result of their application frequently results in worthless unsupportable financial reporting, the issuer and their auditor have but to point to the ‘rules’ in defense. On the other hand, IFRS is principles based, and simpler to apply. But it can and frequently does require the issuer and his auditor to exercise judgment. Judgment that can be questioned, criticized and litigated.
Please don’t misunderstand. Professionally in my opinion the quality of financial reporting will be significantly improved by the application of sound principles. IFRS is long overdue. Without liability reform, however, I fear financial reporting and assurance services will quickly follow the health care industry in terms of cost to the providers.
Maybe I’m just paranoid in my advancing years.