Comments on: SOX 404(b) – The Tar Baby and the SEC http://cfo.markbaileyco.com/governance/sox-404b-the-tar-baby-and-the-sec/ Resources for Public Company CFOs and Controllers Mon, 10 May 2010 06:51:56 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Would SOX 404(b) Have Protected Koss? : Gray Matters http://cfo.markbaileyco.com/governance/sox-404b-the-tar-baby-and-the-sec/comment-page-1/#comment-4542 Would SOX 404(b) Have Protected Koss? : Gray Matters Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:29:57 +0000 http://cfo.markbaileyco.com/?p=299#comment-4542 [...] in place to protect the investor from this type of malfeasance as we’ve discussed in our prior posts.  Another in the form of 404(b)  is not needed.  The responsibility to the shareholders [...] [...] in place to protect the investor from this type of malfeasance as we’ve discussed in our prior posts.  Another in the form of 404(b)  is not needed.  The responsibility to the shareholders [...]

]]> By: Hip Hip Hooray! Permanent exemption from 404(b) for Small Business is Possible! : Gray Matters http://cfo.markbaileyco.com/governance/sox-404b-the-tar-baby-and-the-sec/comment-page-1/#comment-3218 Hip Hip Hooray! Permanent exemption from 404(b) for Small Business is Possible! : Gray Matters Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:02:53 +0000 http://cfo.markbaileyco.com/?p=299#comment-3218 [...] noted in the October 19th blog post by Mark Bailey, the 404(b) requirement for small business issuers is not beneficial in most cases [...] [...] noted in the October 19th blog post by Mark Bailey, the 404(b) requirement for small business issuers is not beneficial in most cases [...]

]]>